How would the 2000s look, pop culture and social wise, without Reagan? Would the media be less toxic and cynical overall without deregulation? What would happen to social justice movements and its reactionaries?
Probably not, but the ruling class, gaining from expanding trade, and from the exodus of capital from high-wage democracies after the 1973 oil crisis, would certainly invest heavily to discover someone who could implement radical tax cuts and deregulation. Who that would be is another issue, as the Republicans did not have anyone with Reagan’s ability to communicate until the 2000s.i Believe there will still be an attempt to rebuild the economy and the military, would it sell as easily without the great communicator?
Remember this is after the era of Bettelheim, and create a happy, yet managed environment.How would Lovaas’ ABA fare ITTL? I believe that “thing” becoming popular, profitable, and aggressive in marketing and promoting misinformation about autism starting from the mid-1990s could be hugely traced back to Reaganomics’ deregulation and gutting of institutions (FDA, Social Welfare, Healthcare, Psychiatry, etc) and privatization of said institutions; therefore leading to less accountability for research fraud, especially for conditions that weren’t as understood as they are now.
Is this correct? (No seriously, FUCK that guy.)